Employers have to let their employees know about theso they can take advantage of the leave guaranteed by the law. But some employees don’t want to apply for . Perhaps they have privacy concerns. Maybe they want to avoid doctor visits or hate dealing with medical paperwork.
If an employee doesn’t take advantage of his, the employer can’t be held liable for not providing leave even if it turns out the employee was eligible.
Recent case: Michael Kobus worked as a painter for a Minnesota college. For years, he had been taking medication for anxiety. He later said he was “not proud” of his need for the drugs and didn’t want to tell anybody about it.
Then he got bad news about several family members and became more anxious. He asked whether he could take time off. HR told him about the FMLA. Kobus got a copy of the forms he would have to fill out and was reminded that the company handbook also included a copy of the FMLA policies.
Kobus told HR he didn’t have a doctor and didn’t want FMLA leave, just “a leave of absence.” He was told that FMLA was his only option. Kobus resigned.
Then he sued, alleging interference with his right to FMLA leave.
The court tossed out his case, reasoning that employees at least have to let their employers know they want FMLA leave after they get the relevant information on how to apply. (Kobus v. The College of St. Scholastica, No. 07-3881, DC MN, 2009)
Final note: Don’t forget that the newhave new notice requirements. If you have an employee handbook, you must now include a general in the handbook. If you don’t have a handbook, you must now give the notice to employees when they are hired.
- Any requirement to pay out or roll over unused sick leave?
- How to guarantee a lawsuit: Fire good employee right after she asks for FMLA leave
- Supreme Court starts new term; age-bias case tops slim HR agenda
- Lawnside settles police dept. bias case for $350,000
- Employer wins battle to withdraw recognition of struggling union