Q. As an alternative to layoffs, our company has cut
A. Under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the general rule is that an employer violates the NLRA when it orders employees not to discuss their wages and salary information. When the employees engage in such communications, they are discussing working conditions among themselves. As such, they are engaged in protected, concerted activity.
The right of employees to engage in such conversations is “protected” because it relates to terms and conditions of their employment. It is “concerted” because the discussions involve more than one employee.
In addition, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held that rules like the one you are considering unlawfully inhibit employees from considering whether to unionize. (Note that you can apply such a rule to managers and supervisors who are not protected by the NLRA; however, such a rule may be difficult to monitor or enforce.)
Finally, the protection afforded employees under the NLRA does not extend to an employee’s use of information that is unavailable in the normal course of work activity or association, such as confidential wage-and-salary information obtained from the employer’s private records and files.
- Remember the WARN Act when making reductions in force
- OMG! TWD is nothing to LOL about: Set policy to ease 'Texting-While-Driving' risks
- How to craft noncompete agreements that work under Georgia law
- How to respond to an EEOC complaint: 10 steps to success
- NLRB adds another wrinkle to arbitration agreement law