by Ron Chapman Jr., Esq., Ogletree Deakins, Dallas
On Jan. 26, the U.S. Supreme Court once again expanded the ability of employees to sue for retaliation.
With seven justices in agreement (and the remaining two concurring), the court held that an employee who answers a question about a fellow employee’s improper conduct during an internal sexual harassment investigation is engaging in “protected activity” under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
As a result, employers will probably face more retaliation claims.
Retaliation against nonvictim?
The case is Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, No. 06-1595, U.S. Supreme Court, 2009.
Vicky Crawford brought the case. The 30-year employee of the metropolitan government of Nashville claimed she was fired in retaliation for answering an HR officer’s questions about whether she had witnessed another employee engage in “inappropriate b...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Remind all decision-makers: Age-related comments almost always lead to courtroom
- State Supreme Court reaffirms: At-will employment is the Texas standard
- 'Current' drug users may not be disabled
- Don't set automatic deadline for workers returning from disability leave.