Carole Smith, who worked for property
But Normandy had demanded she return four weeks after the birth or she would lose her job. When Smith failed to return in four weeks, the firm fired her. She sued under the Civil Rights Act.
At trial, Normandy claimed Smith refused to follow company rules by not informing the company of her return date. The jury was not convinced and awarded her $600,000 in compensatory damages. Then it assessed the company $1.2 million in punitive damages.
Pending an appeal, the company has rehired Smith as a leasing agent.
Note: Federal law bars employers from discriminating against workers based on pregnancy. That includes expectant fathers, too. Anytime an employee is off work for the birth of a child, employers must stay in touch and thoroughly document all actions it takes regarding when the employee will return to work.
Advice: Juries are naturally inclined to sympathize with new parents. Be able to show you followed all the rules … or be prepared to lose such lawsuits.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/8918/management-company-pays-big-for-pregnancy-discrimination "