If you're not already covering prescription contraceptives with your health plan, there's new pressure to do so.
For the first time, a federal court has ruled that excluding contraceptives from a broad health plan violates the.
The opinion by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington said that excluding contraceptives was not a neutral policy because it resulted in a gender gap in the comprehensiveness of the coverage. (Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co., No. C00-1213L, W.D. Wash., 2001)
The ruling is in line with a recent decision from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (YATL, January 2001, p. 5)
Several groups also are pushing legislatures to mandate coverage for contraceptives, even by employers who have fewer than 15 employees and aren't subject to Title VII.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/879/push-for-contraceptive-coverage-gets-shove-from-federal-court "
- 'Secret' consensual love affair with supervisor doesn't mean automatic employer liability
- When creating job descriptions, focus on 'essential functions' employees really perform
- Unholy trinity: 3 employees for the price of 1
- Safety violations cost Cintas $3 million in 3 months
- Alternative Dispute Resolution