To get a job as an airport security agent, Damiana Perez had to agree to arbitrate all employment disputes. The agreement required her and the company to split the costs of filing for arbitration.
When Perez filed suit claiming gender discrimination under Title VII, a federal appeals court let her case go to trial, refusing to uphold the arbitration pact. Why? Title VII allows prevailing parties to recover attorney fees and other ?costs, so any agreement barring that is illegal, the court said. (Perez v. Globe Airport Security Services Inc., No. 00-13489, 11th Cir., 2001)
Advice: The U.S. Supreme Court recently gave employers a green light to arbitrate employment claims, but you still have to be smart in how you craft the agreement. The more an employee has to pay for arbitration, the less likely courts are to uphold your arbitration clause. One measuring stick: Judges don't look favorably on workers paying more to arbitrate than they'd pay to take the case to court.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/877/cost-sharing-can-cost-you-in-arbitration-agreements "
- Age discrimination alert: Beware using high training costs as excuse to deny promotion
- Being sued? Gather all employment records ASAP
- Of mice and Muslims: EEOC sues UPS for bias
- Don't fall into the retaliation trap! Have solid reason for firing complainer
- While Congress mulls federal gay-Bias law, take note of state, local rules