Sometimes, employees don’t have enough information to judge whether something they observe at work is discrimination—or a legitimate
Recent case: Police Officer Timothy Foxx received additional duties, including deciding who participated in training programs. Foxx didn’t receive a higher rank or more pay.
When Foxx’s superior officer disagreed with one of his training decisions (he told Foxx to never again register a particular female officer for training), Foxx protested, citing possible sex discrimination.
Then he lost the training coordinator position, but no other benefits or pay. He sued for retaliation.
The court rejected his lawsuit, concluding no adverse employment action had occurred—he had merely lost one of many duties. Plus, it wasn’t clear that discrimination had occurred. There could have been some other reason to deny training. (Foxx v. Town of Fletcher, No. 1:07-CV-336, WD NC, 2008)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- When good workers go bad: 'Employee of year' award doesn't give immunity from firing
- What's your duty to accommodate domestic violence victims?
- 'Customer preference' is no reason for discriminatory hiring choices
- Make it a policy: Civil behavior required at work