What happens if an employer discourages an employee from taking
Recent case: Richard Smith, who worked for Primecare Medical as vice president of operations, underwent gastric bypass surgery. He expected to be off work for about three weeks following the major surgery.
Complications ensued, and Smith's boss visited him in the hospital to tell him he could stay off as long as he needed, with full pay. No mention of FMLA leave was made, and Smith never took any. He was, however, ready to return to work by the end of 12 weeks. Even so, his boss told him to wait a little longer; Smith continued to receive his salary.
When Smith finally returned to work, Primecare moved him into a different position that paid less.
He sued, alleging interference with . The company argued Smith never took FMLA leave and therefore wasn't entitled to reinstatement.
The court disagreed in principle. It reasoned that Primecare couldn't just ignore a condition that obviously qualified for FMLA leave. Plus, it considered this obvious fact: If Smith had taken FMLA leave, he would have been able to return to work in time. The case will go to a jury trial on interference with the right to FMLA leave. (Smith v. Primecare Medical, No. 1:08-CV-1397, MD PA, 2008)
Final note: Remember, an employee who says he needs surgery has given you notice he may need FMLA leave. Provide him with the information to follow up.
- Failing to ask for 2nd and 3rd medical certs doesn't bar later challenge to FMLA eligibility
- Ballot initiatives in several states and cities usher in employment law changes
- Reinstate employee to equivalent job after FMLA leave
- How to handle habitually late workers
- Can employee on FMLA leave collect unemployment?