Employees who claim they were fired or didn’t get hired because of age discrimination don’t have to prove that the employee who was hired or retained was younger than age 40. Instead, they need only show that the other employee was at least seven years younger.
Recent case: George Evanoff was an executive who at 50 years old was terminated after his company’s owner died and the owner’s heirs took over.
He sued, alleging age discrimination. He said his job duties were spread out among several employees, some of whom were almost seven years younger, and one who was 19 years younger.
The court agreed that the case should go to a jury, and said that someone seven years younger qualified as “substantially younger” under Ohio’s age discrimination law. (Evanoff v. Banner Mattress Company, No. 3:07-CV-1754, ND OH, 2008)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Age-discrimination worry: Is it legal to ask 63-year-old about his retirement plans?
- Name-calling may be just the tip of the iceberg
- Court: Employee can be late filing bias claim with state and still retain 300-day EEOC window
- Mind your P's and P's: Patience and proof are best defense against lawsuits