Employees and their lawyers are always trying to find new ways to expand the claims they can make against employers. They try novel approaches to try to sweeten the recovery pot.
Recent case: Rachel Dick sued her former employer after she was discharged, allegedly because she complained about sexual harassment. Her attorneys tacked on a Pennsylvania common-law charge, alleging that the state allows lawsuits against employers that terminate employees with the specific intent to harm them.
But the court said the only claim outside federal, state and local employment discrimination laws are those that allege an employee was terminated for a reason that violates public policy, such as firing an employee for reporting crimes. (Dick v. Healthcare Risk Solutions, No. 08-2497, ED PA, 2008)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/8391/at-will-employment-remains-alive-and-well-in-pennsylvania "
- Regulating off-duty conduct: How far can you go?
- Disabled employee can't work at all? You can terminate without violating FEHA
- Track contracts for bias against black-Owned firms
- Employee won discrimination case? Understand bias laws' cap on punitive damages
- 'One who hired also fired' doesn't remove discrimination hook