Many California employers are viewing a recent decision by a federal appeals court as a setback. The court upheld the right of local governments to pass ordinances that essentially force employers to provide a certain level of funding for
The court said a San Francisco ordinance requiring employer contributions to employee health care was legal and didn’t violate the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which regulates most employer .
Recent case: In 2006, San Francisco enacted the San Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance. One of the requirements of the law is that for-profit employers with 20 to 99 employees and nonprofit employers with 50 or more employees must contribute at least $1.17 per hour to employee health insurance. For-profit employers with 100 or more employees must contribute $1.76 per hour.
The Golden Gate Restaurant Association challenged the ordinance, contending that ERISA pre-empts the employer spending requirements either because those requirements create a “plan” within the meaning of ERISA or because they “relate to” employers’ ERISA plans.
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected that interpretation. The ordinance was legal and enforceable. (Golden Gate Restaurant Association v. City and County of San Francisco, No. 07-17370, 9th Cir., 2008)
Final note: No doubt, other California municipalities will use the San Francisco ordinance as a template for their own laws mandating benefits levels.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/8333/court-local-governments-can-create-benefit-spending-requirements "
- Asking to get fired in order to receive unemployment comp benefits
- Collective bargaining terms mean no unemployment comp for pregnant employees
- Lost license, lost job? That means no unemployment
- Get ready for the IRS employment-tax audit blitz starting in February
- HR and the bailout: Bill includes key mental health coverage