During a layover in Rome, two Delta flight attendants went shopping. Afterward, the male employee invited his female co-worker to his hotel room to sample a new wine. After drinking a half glass, she blacked out and allegedly was raped by him.
Three weeks later, she reported the drugging and rape to a supervisor. The male flight attendant had a history of rape or assault allegations brought by other flight attendants during layovers or off-duty time, but no disciplinary action had been taken. The victim sued for sexual harassment based on a hostile work environment.
A federal appeals court held the airline accountable. Even though the attack occurred off duty and not at the workplace, the court said attack could be found to have occurred in the "work environment." (Ferris v. Delta Air Lines Inc., 2nd Cir., No. 00-7921, 2001)
The court said Delta had been on notice that the flight attendant twice allegedly raped female co-workers. Yet Delta did nothing about it or encouraged employees to forgo filing formal complaints. The appeals court rejected the company's argument that the prior alleged rapes hadn't placed Delta on notice because those earlier complaints involved off-duty encounters unrelated to work.
Advice: Don't shrug off harassment complaints that involve off-duty or off-premises behavior. Courts are willing to stretch the boundaries of what's considered your "work environment."
In this case, the court's reasoning that the hotel room was part of the work environment was mainly based on the fact that Delta booked and paid for the rooms, the employees didn't have friends where the layover occurred and it was likely the crew members would socialize.
As a result, your sexual harassment policy and training should make clear that harassment is forbidden during off-the-job business travel. You could be held liable for employees' behavior during these off-duty hours.
Also, you have a duty to investigate complaints of misconduct at any off-site location that could be considered a "workplace environment", particularly with employees who have accumulated complaints. The court said Delta knew that this worker had placed other employees at risk. And it was negligent in failing to take steps that might have prevented this latest incident.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/765/definition-of-work-environment-just-got-wider-so-did-your-risk "
- Nine years later, Prudential settlement not quite settled
- They're not too old to spend $6.2 million
- Use 'reasonable person' test to gauge threat of lawsuit for allegedly offensive speech
- PNC's policies for mothers earn a mix of praise and scorn
- Your obligation to accommodate religion begins when employee requests it