Reason: In a closely watched case, a federal court struck down the U.S. Army's officer promotion process on the grounds it discriminates against white men. The policy notes past discrimination against women and minorities when considering officer promotions.
Because promotion boards aren't also required to consider whether there has been past bias against white men, a district court ruled that "this undeniably establishes a preference in favor of one race or gender over another, and therefore is unconstitutional."
The case involved a lawsuit brought by a lieutenant colonel who charged that the Army's policy twice denied him advancement to colonel. (Saunders v. White, Secy. of the Army, No. 99-2807, U.S. D.C., 2002)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/749/examine-your-promotion-policy-for-reverse-discrimination "
- EEOC offers new guidance to avoid bias against employee/caregivers
- Lost the case? Ask for damages to be spelled out.
- When technological change means jobs are changing too, document the training you offer
- OK to vary pay--as long as there's no sex bias
- USERRA: Know your duty to returning disabled reservists