A federal district court tossed out a case brought by an office manager who claimed she was harassed during her pregnancy and fired eight months after she returned to work. Reason: She couldn't provebecause she failed to show that the pregnancy affected her "at or near the time she was terminated," the court said. The employee never claimed her pregnancy continued to affect her physical health. When an employee is not pregnant at or around the time that she suffers a negative employment action, "her membership in the protected class is less clear," the court said. (Solomen v. Redwood Advisory Co., No. 00-CV-858, E.D. Pa., 2002)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- How to Write Meeting Minutes
- Pregnancy discrimination law covers women who've had abortions
- Court: Pregnancy plus slipshod discharge investigation doesn't warrant negligence suit
- Austin grocer pays $186,624 for wage-and-hour violations
- Does your job title matter? You bet!