Can employees file age-discrimination lawsuits based on the fact that a company's action, while not discriminatory on its face, has an unfair impact on workers over age 40? In a handful of circuits (2nd, 8th and 9th) workers are allowed to use this "disparate impact" theory to bring age-bias claims. Six other circuits (1st, 3rd, 6th, 7th, 10th and 11th) say no. The Supreme Court was expected to make a final, decisive call on this issue. It heard oral arguments on a case in March but then dismissed the case without a decision. (Adams v. Florida Power Corp., No. 01-584) Bottom line: Continue to follow your circuit's decision.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/745/supreme-court-drops-pivotal-age-case "
- Stable job history is a legitimate hiring criterion
- Independent contractor or employee? How to make the call
- Go ahead and detail performance problems—criticism isn't an adverse employment action
- Tell supervisors: No stereotyping based on national origin
- Need to conduct a layoff? Use same criteria as for hiring