Minnesota employees are protected from retaliation for reporting possible illegal activities to their employers.
Recent case: Charles Hayes worked for an auto repair shop for 16 years until the company laid him off. Hayes sued, alleging the company fired him because he had complained that a co-worker was telling customers they had to replace perfectly good parts. Hayes said this was whistle-blowing under the Minnesota Whistleblower Act. The trial court dismissed the case, and he appealed.
The Court of Appeals of Minnesota ordered a trial. It said Hayes’ frequent complaints about illegal sales constituted whistle-blowing attempts. The fact that he was terminated when a junior employee—the one who allegedly made the fraudulent sales—kept his job could have been retaliation. (Hayes v. Dapper, et al., No. A07-1878, Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2008)
- Include federal jury service protection in your employee handbook and policies
- Poor performance review and improvement plan alone aren't signs of retaliation
- Tame the paper: Creating a system for daily records management
- Dirty Dozen: 12 manager mistakes that spark lawsuits
- Do we have to pay for nonexempt's travel time for one-day out-of-town trips?