No one likes a layoff, especially the affected employees—who may look for a reason to sue. Smart employers can stop many baseless lawsuits by using objective, neutral criteria to select which workers will lose their jobs. That’s what happened in the following case.
Recent case: Debra Jackson, who is black, sued after she was laid off during a RIF. She charged race discrimination.
But her employer could explain how it chose Jackson. First, it looked at how to make the necessary job cuts while maintaining good customer service. Then it picked which positions to eliminate without looking at the names of the employees holding those positions. Within those job categories, it proceeded to cut people strictly on the basis of tenure.
Jackson couldn’t point to anything to contradict her employer. She lost her case. (Jackson v. City and County of Denver, No. 06-CV-01430, DC CO, 2008)
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/6849/use-blind-process-to-decide-who-loses-during-rif "
- Good news: EEOC doesn't have the last word in deciding discrimination cases
- New for New York employers: union posters, NYC religious accommodation
- Judge to lawyers: Enough 'pettifoggery and piffle!'
- When litigious employee continues to threaten retaliation suit
- Consider tighter limits on employees' time to file suit