I’m not going to tell you that it’s OK
to lie, cheat and steal. But I’m also not going to preach that you should act
like a Boy Scout or Girl Scout all the time. There’s a middle ground—and that’s
the smart place to be.
Listen, it’s easy to give speeches
about how your department must maintain “the highest ethical standards.” That
means nothing. Zero. Zip.
Talking about how honest you are
doesn’t make it so. In fact, most veteran business people find such assurances
worrisome. The folks with the cleanest record don’t discuss it. They let their
actions do the talking.
Full disclosure or partial truth?
When I’m talking to employees about our
plans for the next quarter, I can’t say, “This all depends on whether I
negotiate a merger next week,” or, “Some of you in this room won’t be around by
the end of next quarter because I’m canning you.”
To me, the No. 1 ethical dilemma is
deciding how much to tell people. When you’re CEO, you’re privy to all kinds of
confidential information.
I’ve found the safest approach is to
lie by omission when necessary, but never by commission. I may omit a few key
facts when responding to a manager’s question about our company’s growth plans,
but I won’t give false facts.
It’s what I call “selective silence.”
Choose when to shut up. If you’re pressed to reveal more, evade the issue by
promising to “give that more thought” before you answer. Then move on.
Defending the indefensible
I’m not saying you should try to get
away with murder. If you have an obligation to hide a pending deal, that’s one
thing. But if you’re downright deceptive, that’s another.
Many years ago, I had an employee who
was advising a new, potentially huge client. He accidentally billed the client
for 10 extra hours, and the client paid without a peep. He told me what
happened and said, “Hell, I got away with it once. Maybe I should keep doing
it.”
I said firmly, “Oh, come on now. Get
serious.” Then I laughed and added, “If you keep it up, don’t tell me.” I soon
forgot about it, assuming he would never intentionally overcharge the client.
Six months later, I got a letter from
the client saying they’re firing us. They wrote that my firm billed them for
144 extra hours! So I let a gravy-train customer get away because I didn’t put
my foot down.
Sleeping like a baby
For me, the test of whether I act
ethically is whether I sleep well. Do I go to bed rationalizing what I did,
trying to justify what my conscience tells me was wrong? Or can I take pride in
handling a delicate situation in a way that would make my parents proud?
Last month I spoke to a trade group. I
made some controversial points about our business. I cited two studies that
supported my views.
What I didn’t say was that some
respected critics found flaws in these studies, and that my firm helped fund
one of them. But I did provide handouts that disclosed all this information. I
felt that was enough.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/6757/slimy-sleazy-and-smart "
Related Articles...
- Can Notes on a Napkin Leave an Age Discrimination Paper Trail?
- The firing meeting: 4 classic mistakes
- Terminated employee claims discrimination? Warn managers against any sort of retaliation
- Minor mistakes aren't enough to prove bias
- Head off problem employees' retaliation suits: Document all decision-making as it happens






