Advice: You may not be aware that a few poorly chosen words could open up the company to a discrimination lawsuit. For example, see if you can recognize the three problems with the following ad:
“Waiters/busboys. Looking for energetic, recent H.S. grad to work midnight shift at 24- hour restaurant. Great potential for growth. Apply in person or via mail to Ms. Willis, 100 Columbia Way. EOE.”
Using age as a job-selection criterion (“recent H.S. grad”). That violates the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Age can sometimes be a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ), as in the case of airline pilots. But no court would agree that age is a BFOQ for such a restaurant job.
Specifying gender (“busboy” or “waiter”). Those terms are not gender neutral and could be viewed as discriminatory. Instead, use “wait staff” and “buspersons.”
Requiring a high school diploma. That might be seen as discriminatory because it could be argued that a diploma is not a BFOQ for this job.
Here is how a safer version would read:
“Restaurant night crew. 24-hour restaurant looking for wait staff and buspersons to work midnight shift. Great potential for growth. Apply in person or via mail to Ms. Willis, 100 Columbia Way. EOE.”
- FDNY's discrimination tab could reach $65M
- How do we deal with a biased customer?
- Despite recent 8th Circuit ruling, stamp out 'equal-opportunity harassment' to keep harmony
- He said/she said: Gauging credibility in harassment cases
- Remind supervisors: Constructive criticism is expected--not an excuse for employees to sue