While he was taking leave for depression under theAct ( ), Jerry Ogborn got the ax. Reason: During the absence, his employer discovered that Ogborn, a union business agent, failed to file member grievances in a timely way.
Ogborn sued under FMLA, saying the union failed to reinstate him to his job as the law requires. But an appeals court tossed out his case. While it's usually illegal for an employer to refuse to reinstate an employee who takes valid, that right isn't absolute when the worker's job performance is obviously lacking. (Ogborn v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Nos. 00-3779 & 01-1546, 7th Cir., 2002)
Advice: You can fire an employee on FMLA leave forif, and only if, you can prove that the worker would have been fired regardless of the leave. But that's often difficult to prove, particularly if you have no paper trail.
It's vital to supervise employees more closely and document theiron paper before they ask for FMLA leave. Otherwise, you're almost begging for a retaliation lawsuit.
If an employee takes FMLA leave and you have no previous record of his poor performance, don't fire him while he's out. You're on safer ground waiting a couple of months and beginning yourprocess if the poor performance continues.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- ADA: Firing OK if health problem is minor
- How will the election affect employment law?
- When transition looms, note employee interest in staying on
- No place to hide for scofflaw California employers