Here’s another thing to worry about when an employee testifies on behalf of someone suing the company: Retaliating against that employee by punishing him with additional or new work requirements or a poor evaluation may lead to federal criminal conspiracy charges.
Recent case: John Odum worked for Rayonier, bidding on timber for the company. When a third-party wood producer sued the company for alleged breach of contract, Odum was called as a witness and testified truthfully. The wood producer won a $1.2 million verdict.
Odum claimed that shortly after, company officials began a concerted effort to punish him for testifying. He said they demanded he move closer to work, gave him a poor evaluation and established unreasonable performance-improvement goals. Odum claimed the retaliation left him with major depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.
He sued, alleging that company officials conspired to punish him for testifying.
A jury agreed. The company appealed, but the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to reverse the verdict. It said that conspiring to retaliate against a witness by causing bodily injury to that person for testifying in an official proceeding is a federal crime—and that bodily injury can include impairing someone’s mental faculties. (Odum v. Rayonier, et al., No. 06-16251, 11th Cir., 2008)
- Solving for the unknown: No duty to accommodate disability that employee never revealed
- Keep careful track of work-restriction notes
- Violating your e-policies can be a federal crime
- Appeals court rules Obama's NLRB appointments were illegal
- Must we turn over personnel records that might compromise an investigation?