Some employees who are having
But jumping the gun and disciplining the employee for the first mistake she makes after she requests leave can backfire badly—especially if you have ignored similar mistakes or problems until now. That looks like retaliation and interference with .
Patience is a virtue. Instead of acting immediately, wait until you have a rock-solid reason to discipline, especially if the punishment is termination.
Recent case: Shortly after she started her job as a billing clerk, Anna Harris informed her supervisors she had type 2 diabetes. Then she developed hepatitis C. She claimed later that her supervisor told her if she ever tried to use medical leave, she would be terminated.
Harris had had some performance problems all along, but none that warranted termination. She made a few billing mistakes and once came to work wearing sweatpants in violation of the dress code. But all in all, she got passable evaluations.
Then Harris e-mailed her supervisor, explaining that she needed to take FMLA leave soon. The company fired her two days later, supposedly because she had violated a rule that said billing clerks shouldn’t start conversations with other clerks when delivering bills.
Harris sued, alleging FMLA violations.
The court said her case should go to trial. It concluded that Harris had cast doubt on the employer’s rationale for her discharge. The timing seemed very suspicious and the offense seemed minor, even for a less-than-ideal employee. (Harris v. Amerisourcebergen, No. 05-2036, DC NJ, 2008)
- Firing shortly after follow-up FMLA care may be retaliation
- No automatic FMLA leave for employer-caused condition
- Complaining about co-worker's harassment may be protected
- Check the validity of reasons behind a supervisor's call for firing
- Flexible schedules bill runs into inflexible congressional calendar