Q. I have an employee in my department who was involved in a fight at work. He has asked to be allowed to resign rather than be terminated. I like this guy. Should I let him do this?
A. No. One of the most common mistakes employers make is trying to be too nice when it’s time to terminate an employee. You should treat equally all employees who have engaged in conduct warranting termination, and you should inform them of the specific grounds for termination.
Letting an employee “resign” can cause significant problems if, for example, the employee later claims he was forced to resign because of his membership in a protected class (e.g., race, national origin, disability). The employer’s after-the-fact assertion that the employee was actually terminated for fighting could end up looking like a concocted excuse, giving a reviewing jury or court reason to disbelieve the employer.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/5429/whats-wrong-with-letting-an-employee-resign-instead-of-firing-him "
- What's this I hear about a 'cooling-off' period in layoffs involving severance pay?
- Firing Guard or Reserve member? Better show you would have taken action despite service
- Choose 'firing words' carefully; stick to performance
- HR CSI: How to conduct a post-mortem of a legal claim
- Vague policy could entitle employees to extra vacation pay