Sometimes injured employees need more time off than the 12 weeks allowed under the
Their presumption: They are disabled under the ADA and therefore entitled to accommodations. That may be true if their conditions are permanent, but not if their conditions are merely temporary. Employers can deny requests without violating the ADA.
Recent case: Robert Hershgordon, a night manager at a Pathmark grocery store, hurt his back while at work. He underwent several back surgeries. While the time off was covered by workers’ comp, he still wanted to return full time.
Hershgordon asked Pathmark’s ADA committee to let him return to work even though he had not fully recovered. The committee denied his request three times even though each request was accompanied by a new medical report showing steady improvement.
Hershgordon sued, alleging he was being denied a reasonable accommodation. But the court said that his ailment was temporary, and therefore he wasn’t covered by the ADA or entitled to any accommodations. (Hershgordon v. Pathmark Stores, No. 07-2731, 3rd Cir., 2008)
Final note: Warn anyone who is making the accommodations decision not to make statements indicating the condition is permanent. That could lead to a “regarded as disabled” lawsuit.
- Labor Dept. proposes extensive revisions to FMLA regulations
- Warn employees: No FMLA certification, no excused absence
- Gov't workers with free speech claims can charge retaliation
- If you have doubts about FMLA eligibility, don't hesitate to seek a second medical opinion
- Work rules can regulate some employee political advocacy