American Industrial Sales Corp., a Rochester-based distributor of highway and industrial safety products, will pay $375,000 to 18 women to settle an EEOC sexual harassment lawsuit.
The EEOC charged that the company’s owner, president, vice president and members of the sales staff subjected the women to inappropriate touching, sexual advances and vulgar sexual comments. Four of the women were teenagers.
EEOC trial attorney Margaret Malloy said, “Women and girls should not have to endure sexual harassment in the workplace, and especially not from the highest levels of the corporation."
Note: Teenagers are particularly vulnerable to workplace harassment because of their inexperience. They are also less likely than adults to speak up about it. Managers working with teenagers should have specific training. In 2004, the
EEOC launched the Youth@Work campaign to help employers create positive work experiences for young workers. Visit www.eeoc.gov/initiatives/youth/index.html for more information.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/5099/sexual-harassment-costs-rochester-company-375000 "
- Experience isn't the only valid job qualification
- Don't get nicked by grooming policies that have disparate impact on minorities
- Workers' comp law: How to keep costs, compliance in check
- Cite specifics when firing to beat discrimination charges
- Firing for poor work or rule breaking? Clear business reason will beat lawsuit