Managers of the Razzoo’s Cajun Café chain of 11 restaurants in Texas and North Carolina thought they had hit on a surefire way to build bar business: Make sure 80% of their bartenders were women. One factor they failed to consider: The EEOC takes a dim view of such hiring quotas.
Now Razzoo’s is paying the price for what the EEOC said is discrimination—a cool $1 million.
In May, the Dallas-based chain agreed to pay $775,000 to settle a sex discrimination lawsuit brought by the EEOC on behalf of male employees who alleged they were systematically denied promotion to high-paying bartender positions. The EEOC claimed Razzoo’s practices violated Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Razzoo’s is also required to spend at least $225,000 to retain a human resources consultant or develop a human resources department. It agreed to train all its employees, post anti-discrimination notices, review its complaint procedures, and provide employees with convenient, confidential and reliable mechanisms for reporting discrimination.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Misclassifying employees as contractors? IRS wants to know
- HR and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
- Lessons from the 2006 SHRM conference: Green M&Ms and other little motivational tools
- Can we request applicants' Facebook passwords?