East Brunswick High School football coach Marcus Borden ran afoul of the U.S. Constitution when he prayed with his team, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia has ruled.
Borden, a Spanish teacher and coach at East Brunswick since 1983, routinely joined in prayers at team meals and invited players to pray silently in the locker room before games.
But civil libertarians complained that the prayers introduced religion into the public school system, in violation of the First Amendment.
Borden sued the district for the right to silently join in pregame prayers and prevailed in district court in 2006. The federal appeals court annulled that decision, ruling that Borden was “endorsing religion.”
Final note: Remind employees that proselytizing has no place at work. While employees may be entitled to reasonable accommodations for their religious beliefs, they don’t include interfering with the beliefs of others.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/5043/court-tackles-pregame-prayer-rules-it-out-of-bounds "
- Maintaining employee's dignity is key to avoiding constructive discharge
- New civil-union law means employers must make decisions
- Follow all leads when investigating allegations--even if they take query in new direction
- Supreme Court: Oral complaints have retaliation protection, too
- Supreme Court rules on third-party retaliation: Relatives protected