In such a case, offering a few more weeks of leave might be a reasonable ADA accommodation.
Recent case: Kathryn Shimell took to undergo spinal surgery. Her employer terminated her when she didn’t return from leave after 12 weeks had passed. She sued, arguing that she was disabled and should have been allowed to take additional time off to recover as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.
Her employer argued that although Shimell was disabled, she was not otherwise qualified for her job since she was unable to report to her office for about 10 months following her FMLA leave.
But the trial court hearing the case said a jury should have the chance to decide the case. It concluded that additional leave might very well have been a reasonable accommodation under the ADA. (Shimell v. De Lage Landen Financial Services, No. 05-CV-6620, ED PA, 2008)
Final note: Not every employee who qualifies for FMLA leave is disabled, but the reverse is almost always true—someone who is disabled most likely also has a serious health condition under the FMLA.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- OK to fire older worker despite ageist comments
- Special performance measures deviate from usual practice? Be sure to document reason
- Not every work dispute is a 'federal case'
- When RIF costs protected employee's job, take care how you reassign the work