Coca-Cola fired Dudley Thompson, who is black and from Jamaica, for not following company protocol when he went on vacation to the island—he failed to put his vacation request in writing and arrange for shift coverage. Then he stayed away so long that one of his co-workers ended up working 40 days straight, in part to cover Thompson’s shifts.
A supervisor referred the matter to HR while Thompson was still in Jamaica. HR spoke with everyone involved. When he returned, Thompson was called into a meeting to discuss why he hadn’t followed company vacation procedures. When he could offer no good explanation, Coca-Cola fired him.
Thompson sued, claiming his supervisor was a racist who had once said “I hate … Jamaicans.”
But the court looked at the company’s termination process and concluded it had treated Thompson fairly without any bias. (Thompson v. Coca-Cola, No. 07-2107, 1st Cir., 2008)
Lesson learned: Coke handled this case just right. HR independently investigated Thompson’s infraction, gave him a chance to explain and then made a good-faith decision to fire him. Those actions effectively insulated the employer from the supervisor’s alleged biased comment about Jamaicans.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/4991/open-inquiry-protects-against-firing-bias "
- 'Pig' kept right on working; hospital going straight to court
- Online discussions increase company communications, liability
- Jury delivers $2.1 million verdict to UPS
- NLRB: Pre-emptive firing to prevent employees from discussing pay and benefits is illegal
- Firing reason doesn't have to be perfect to withstand discrimination claims