Chances are your organization performs
Many employers conduct background checks when investigating reports of employee misconduct, such as alleged sexual harassment or suspected theft.
Employers that use third parties (referred to in the law as credit reporting agencies, or CRAs) to perform background checks and investigations need to be aware of the requirements of the federal (FCRA).
How the FCRA works
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces the FCRA. The FTC conducts employer audits to find out whether an employer is using a CRA to conduct background checks and, if so, whether the employer provided required notices to those being investigated. Employers need to retain records that show compliance.
The statute also permits individuals who believe their FCRA rights have been violated to sue their employers and others directly in federal court.
Violations of FCRA can be costly. Individuals harmed by FCRA violations may claim actual damages as well as attorneys’ fees. A willful violation also can lead to punitive damages. In addition, the FTC can seek civil penalties for noncompliance.
Once you receive
If that’s the case, the FCRA imposes two requirements.
First, the FCRA requires the employer to hold off making an adverse employment decision. The employer must first send the applicant a notice about the report. The notice must allow the applicant to correct any information that might be inaccurate. This is known as the “pre-adverse action disclosure.”
Second, assuming the applicant does not respond or otherwise challenge the report, the employer must inform the applicant that the adverse action was made and that it was based on the report. This is known as the “adverse action notice.”
Investigations and ‘the Vail letter’
Employee investigations, such as investigation of sexual harassment complaints, create different FCRA issues.
Several years ago, the FTC took the position that an employer that hired a third party, such as a law firm, to conduct an investigation had to comply with the FCRA if the results of the investigation might lead to an adverse action. The FTC set forth this position in a staff opinion letter known as “the Vail letter.”
The Vail letter created practical problems for employers. Employers have a statutory obligation to investigate problems such as sexual harassment. However, under the FCRA, an alleged harasser might be able to prevent an investigation by withholding consent to conduct an investigation. Also, an employer might not want to permit the alleged harasser to see the investigation report.
In 2003, Congress amended the FCRA in response to these concerns. There is now a specific but limited exclusion for certain communications made during an employee investigation. That exclusion applies to employment misconduct investigations, investigations into federal or state law or regulation compliance, and several other types of investigations.
Note, though, that the communication cannot be connected to an investigation of someone’s credit worthiness, credit standing or credit capacity. Plus, the communication can be shared only with limited people, such as the employer and its agents, government personnel or applicable self-regulatory organizations. If these conditions are met, the investigation would not be subject to the FCRA, so the notice and disclosure obligations would not apply.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/4921/background-checks-employee-investigations-and-the-fcra "
- Ledbetter's lesson: Revamp salary guidelines to make pay as fair as possible
- Federal HR pros, take note: Bias complainers may contact any EEO officer to press claims
- Essential Topics in Employee Handbooks
- Spying shrinks, paranoia at work in state mental hospitals?
- Fed contractors to pay almost $1M to rejected applicants