The EEOC is suing a Pennsylvania steel plant for condoning sexual harassment by allowing offensive pictures, posters and calendars in the office. The lawsuit claims a shipping clerk and other female employees had to view offensive material for at least two years. According to the suit, a company representative failed to respond to female workers' complaints because he feared a backlash from male employees who "would get mad at him" if he removed the pictures. The lesson: Doing what's legally correct versus what's popular among staff are often two very different things. (EEOC v. Akers National Roll Co.)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Document discipline investigation steps to show sincerity, lack of discrimination
- Can we make a deaf employee and his boss learn sign language?
- Goodhue County, Minn. dismisses 'breast staring' complaint
- When executive wants to ease into retirement, can we insist on a 'retirement contract'?