If your company has fewer than 50 workers, yet is somehow linked to another employer or location, you may incorrectly believe that you don't need to comply with theAct ( ). If this fits your situation, read on to find out whether you need to start complying.
The FMLA says you must comply if you employ 50 or more workers within a 75-mile radius. Separate companies are usually viewed as separate employers. But the Labor Department sometimes classifies a group of smaller businesses as an "integrated employer" if the companies are linked in some way, thus forcing all those small companies to comply. Franchised and spun-off businesses are particularly vulnerable.
Are you an integrated employer? The Labor Department will examine four factors to decide if two or more employers or locations are "integrated":
2. Relationship among operations.
3. Centralized control of labor relations.
4. Degree of common ownership or financial control.
Having any one of these items doesn't automatically make you an integrated employer, but courts will look at the totality of circumstances to make the decision.
Recent case: The manager at a Massachusetts pizza store filed an FMLA lawsuit.
The employer argued that the law didn't apply to his store because it doesn't employ 50 or more people. He admitted that it would cross the 50-employee threshold if each of its three pizza franchises together were deemed "integrated." But each store stood alone in management structure and financial control.
The court disagreed and let the case proceed. Reason: Enough linkage existed among those three stores to make them an integrated employer, pushing them over the 50-employee limit. The stores were part of the same franchise (Domino's), and they shared a workers' comp policy. (Cousin v. Sofono Inc., No. 01-30186-MAP, DMass, 2003)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- 10 Secrets to an Effective Performance Review
- What's the deadline for required distributions?
- Pentagon Increases Citizen-Soldiers' Active-Duty Time
- Manager's Checkup: Your goal--fantasy or reality?
- 7th Circuit: Disabled have preference for vacant jobs