Q. We are about to terminate an employee for several reasons. Are we required to provide a written document explaining the reasons for her termination?
A. No. Absent an employment contract specifically requiring such statement, there is no requirement for employers to provide employees with a written statement—or even an oral one—setting forth the reasons for termination.
Nevertheless, it is a good idea for employers to document the reason for the discharge. Do this in writing at the time of the termination. Such documentation will provide the employer a contemporaneous record of the reason for the termination, which can be used to defend potential claims for unemployment benefits, discrimination, wrongful discharge or similar claims.
It is the employer’s option whether to provide this document to the employee or to provide any separate statement explaining the reason for the discharge. Before you do, it is a good idea to go over the explanation with your attorney.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/4841/must-we-explain-reason-for-termination "
- You could be personally liable for injuries under N.C. workers' comp law
- How to respond when employees show mental instability
- Are you 'overcomplying'? 7 laws you might be able to ignore
- Shelving of controversial 'card check' provision doesn't mean union-friendly EFCA bill is dead
- Erroneous 'ERISA' label doesn't rule out state regulation