Good news for employers with strong anti-nepotism policies: The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals has rejected a claim based on alleged familial status discrimination.
The court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act does not protect family members from an employer’s decision not to hire a relative when company rules bar nepotism.
The case involved a husband, wife and daughter. They claimed they had been discharged from a nonprofit agency because the husband had allegedly hired his wife and daughter despite a company policy against employing relatives. They claimed the discharge constituted sex discrimination based on familial relationships and said other parent/child employees had not been terminated.
Final note: The EEOC is pushing the envelope when it comes to combination discrimination. For example, it has said it might be sex discrimination to make employment decisions based on real or perceived family care responsibilities. Cases such as this one may mean that courts won’t easily be persuaded that current laws can be twisted to create new discrimination categories.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/4704/anti-nepotism-trumps-familial-status-discrimination "
- Defying expectations: Why failing to live up to stereotypes won't make worker's suit a winner
- Accommodating hearing-Impaired employees, applicants
- Hair today or gone tomorrow: It's up to employee to mention religion
- Court carves out another age-bias class: Employees age 50 and older
- Manager 'smirks' about employee's situation? That's not enough to justify a lawsuit