Q. My understanding is that an employee must file a charge of sex discrimination with the EEOC or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights (MDCR) within 180 days. I have been told by the EEOC that it will investigate charges filed within 300 days of the alleged discriminatory act. Which is correct?
A. The period of time allowed to file a charge of discrimination with the MDCR in Michigan is 180 days (Mich. Admin. Code, R 37.4). The time for filing with the EEOC is also 180 days, unless the charging party “has initially instituted proceedings with a State or local agency,” in which case the charging party has 300 days to file with the EEOC (42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)).
This seems pretty simple—the charging party must file somewhere within 180 days. But that is not how the EEOC sees it. The EEOC takes the position that a charge will be processed if filed within 300 days, even if the employee did not file as required with the state agency (in Michigan, it would be with the MDCR) within 180 days. I have fought the EEOC on this issue, and it is unrelenting.
Just as an aside, a charging party can file a civil lawsuit in Michigan without having filed a charge with either the EEOC or the MDCR. The statute of limitations is three years.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/4595/filing-a-michigan-discrimination-claim "
- Appeals court to lower courts: Consider NYC claims separately
- Beware disciplining worker who has claimed harassment
- How can we make the season brightâ€”without exposing ourselves to legal liability?
- Hiring: Sometimes, personal questions are OK
- Supreme Court backs employee following 'cat's paw' boss bias