As more time passes after an employee takes
But be careful. If you fire someone shortly after he has a follow-up medical appointment related to an old FMLA-covered condition, the retaliation clock could start ticking again. A court could link the incident back to the original leave and see possible retaliation. As the following case shows, that may be enough to send the case to a jury trial.
Recent case: Robert Moll worked as an engineer for Tyco Healthcare when he injured his foot. The injury led to an infection and Moll needed a skin graft plus surgery. He took FMLA leave.
After he returned, his supervisors began complaining about his work performance. Because business was brisk, they also instituted an 80-hour workweek. Finally, six months after Moll returned from FMLA leave, he was discharged. But the termination came a day after he took approved time off for a follow-up medical appointment. He sued, alleging retaliation for taking FMLA leave.
Tyco argued that there was nothing to link the FMLA leave months earlier to the discharge. The trial court disagreed. It concluded that the follow-up was connected with the original leave, and the almost immediate termination after that medical appointment could imply a “causal connection” between Moll’s earlier FMLA leave and his termination. A jury will decide whether that’s the case. (Moll v. Tyco Healthcare, No. 1:06-00046, SD OH, 2008)
- Winning lawsuit no slam-Dunk when firing follows romance
- Employee thinks he has you over a barrel? If it sounds like extortion, fire him!
- One less tune for whistle-blowers to play: Sarbanes-Oxley Act trumps Colorado common law
- Complying with the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act
- Suspect FMLA mischief? Use certification rights before taking drastic action