Eugene Gates Jr. had worked in a Charlotte, N.C., grocery store for nearly 40 years when it was purchased by Compare Foods, based in Freeport, N.Y. Shortly after the buyout, Compare cut his hours in half and gave his shifts to a young Hispanic worker. Compare told Gates that the company needed someone who could relate to the store’s Hispanic customers. Gates resigned.
A month later, two other workers in the department were fired. Gates joined them in an EEOC suit that alleged race and national origin discrimination.
Compare settled the lawsuit for $40,000, but maintained the workers were treated fairly. Company attorney Phil Van Hoy argued that under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a business can require employees to have certain qualifications if it can prove a business necessity. If you have a Hispanic customer base, Van Hoy said, it’s legal “to have enough of your employees who can communicate with them.”
It’s a tough sell, and one the EEOC evidently didn’t buy.
Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!
Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...
We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.
The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.
" This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/4518/ny-based-grocery-chain-to-pay-40000-discrimination-settlement "
- Workers' Comp: Ohio's Top Court Says 'Tough Luck' to Safety Slackers
- HR protected—But only if it actually helped file bias claims
- Austin fire department prevails in gender bias lawsuit
- Check yourself: Can you show equal treatment at discipline time?
- Supreme Court: Even good faith can lead to discrimination