Austin, Tx.-based e-MDs, which develops software for managing medical practices, faces charges it terminated an employee because she took.
The EEOC has filed suit in federal court on behalf of the fired woman, claiming the company violated theand Title VII of the Civil Rights Act when it laid her off while she was recuperating from a difficult pregnancy.
The woman worked as a client service analyst for the company. Following her pregnancy, she suffered from heart arrhythmia and an adrenal gland condition that substantially limited her circulatory function. She asked for extended leave as an accommodation.
e-MDs decided to cut a position while she was on leave. Her immediate supervisor recommended another, less qualified employee for termination, but supervisors overruled him and had the woman terminated instead.
She filed acomplaint with the EEOC. When the parties could not settle the dispute through the commission’s conciliation process, the EEOC sued on her behalf. The suit seeks back pay, compensatory damages and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief.
Advice: Always have objective, business-related criteria for your firing decisions. If you ever have to deny a disability accommodation, be prepared to provide documentation showing the accommodation constituted an undue burden.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Afraid you messed up (or have to pay up)? Try offering to reinstate fired employee
- Texas congresswoman's staffer loses discrimination case
- Court imposes anti-harassment policy on San Antonio company
- Accommodate disabled workers, but don't accept mediocre job performance