by Subhash Viswanathan and Jacqueline Smith, Bond Schoeneck & King
Among the cases that the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear during its 2015-2016 term is one of particular significance to those in the public sector—Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association. A decision in favor of the plaintiffs has the potential to affect the implementation and regulation of union agency shop fees nationwide.
Union shop fees
The case was originally brought by a California public school teacher, Rebecca Friedrichs, who argued that the mandatory payment of agency shop fees violated her First Amendment right to free association and free speech.
Currently, public-sector employees in New York who choose not to join the union that has been certified as their collective bargaining representative are required (under the so-called Taylor Law) to pay fees associated with the union’s collective bargaining and contract administration costs.
The...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- EEOC finds fault with 'no-fault' attendance policies
- You can put your seniority system ahead of ADA accommodation
- Camera phones at work: Shoot down this latest legal threat
- Stick with objective assessments to ensure your processes aren't swayed by bias