A 54-year-old supervisor'sduties were handed to a 48-year-old employee. The supervisor sued under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. A federal appeals court tossed out the case. Court's reason: The employee wasn't replaced by a person "significantly younger." To help other courts decide this issue in the future, the appeals court reviewed more than 60 cases regarding what constitutes a significant age difference. Its decision: "In the absence of direct evidence that the employer considered age to be significant, an age difference of six years or less between an employee and a replacement is not significant." (Grosjean v. First Energy Corp., No. 02-3361, 6th Cir., 2003)
Get weekly updates on breaking news and business advice to help you advance your career! The week's top stories and resources will be sent right to your inbox. Choose the topics you're interested in:
We value your Privacy.
Previous post: Check employment-law compliance with online audits
Next post: Good news: Your flaws are not fatal!