Sometimes, employees can quit their jobs and still sue, claiming they were terminated. That’s called “constructive discharge” and savvy lawyers sometimes use it to get a lawsuit into court when an employer gives the employee the choice between resigning or being fired.
The idea is that an employer shouldn’t be able to avoid responsibility for a discriminatory action simply because the employee wanted to avoid the stig-ma of being fired.
However, courts don’t allow employees to use constructive discharge as an excuse to quit unless they can off substantial reasons why they felt they had no choice but to resign.
Recent case: Parker and Melvin both worked as insurance sales managers for Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. They had the same supervisor and both were over age 40. Both claimed they were top performers.
Apparently their supervisor didn’t agree and placed them both on performance improvement plans (PIPs) for al...(register to read more)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Good-Faith Process—But Not Absolutely Correct Conclusion—Is Enough to Fire Harasser
- Use statistics early to blow shaky lawsuits out of water
- Employee performance not up to snuff? You must communicate your concerns
- Employees can't claim retaliation if they're not FMLA-eligible