A. According to guidance from the U.S. Department of Labor, under the provisions of the FMLA an employee on FMLA leave is not protected from actions that would have affected him or her if he or she had never taken FMLA leave.
For example, if a shift has been eliminated or overtime decreased, an employee would not be entitled to return to work that shift or the original overtime hours. If an employee is laid off during the period of FMLA leave, the employer must be able to show that the employee would not have been employed at the time of reinstatement.
It is important to provide documentation that other employment actions (such as discharge or reduction of hours) would have affected the employee had he or she not been on FMLA leave, as it is illegal to discriminate against employees for taking FMLA leave.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- FMLA cases can hang on suspicious timing, internal documents
- Contractor or employee? New IRS audits turn up heat on worker misclassification
- Prescription alone doesn't rate FMLA leave
- FMLA notwithstanding, it's OK to consider attendance in RIF