Some litigants don’t want to listen to their attorneys when it comes to case. That can make it difficult to settle a case or even cooperate with the other side. And things can get worse if the employee fires counsel and wants the equivalent of a do-over. Fortunately, most judges won’t let that happen.
Recent case: Monique was terminated for alleged time recording violations. She sued for retaliation, racial harassment and discrimination. However, during her deposition, she largely admitted that the racial slurs she allegedly heard hadn’t happened. Perhaps realizing she had damaged her case, she fired her attorney and asked the court to start over.
The court refused, noting that discovery was already closed. The case was dismissed. (Jackson v. Federal Express, No. 12-CV-1475, 2nd Cir., 2014)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Lost in MySpace: Know the law before searching web for applicant info
- Cut lawsuit risk by filling vacant position with similar person
- Supreme Court's new term: Arbitration, disparate impact on docket
- Honestly believe worker broke rule? Firing OK