Answering reference calls? Don’t think all responses are protected by “free speech” rights.
Recent case: Tony was a certified nursing assistant at a nursing home. Although he is a man, he routinely wears a wig, makeup, jewelry and women’s clothes. Tony alleged he was often harassed about his appearance and ultimately fired based on false allegations of patient abuse.
After applying for several jobs and being turned down after prospective employers checked his references, Tony sued. He alleged defamation and interference with contracts.
The nursing home argued that it was immune from liability for anything its representative may have said under the Texas Citizens Participation Act, which guarantees free speech when discussing public concerns. The court didn’t buy that argument. Unless they’re truthful, reference statements may create liability. (Rivers v. Johnston Custodial, et al., No. 14-CA-484, WD TX, 2014)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Harassment a problem in the past? That's no excuse for not hiring women
- Law requires drug and alcohol tests for contract van drivers of rail crews
- Monitor hiring process for subtle 'name discrimination'
- Can we limit our applicant pool to U.S. citizens?