Workers alleging disability discrimination generally have to show that they have a condition that substantially limits a major life function. But they don’t necessarily have to drag a doctor into court. They can prove a condition such as alcoholism by showing that they underwent inpatient treatment and suffered withdrawal symptoms while there.
Recent case: When Julie was arrested for public intoxication, she immediately entered an inpatient alcohol treatment program. Her employer fired her forduring treatment.
She sued, alleging bothand ADA violations. She told the court she couldn’t call in during the first seven days in treatment because she was not allowed outside contact.
She went on to describe going through detox and having withdrawal symptoms. She explained that before her arrest, she frequently drank a half-gallon of alcohol at night.
When a jury sided with Julie, her employer appealed. It argued that Julie had never presented medical evidence that she had been diagnosed with alcoholism and therefore hadn’t proven either that she was disabled or had a serious health condition under the ADA or the FMLA.
The court disagreed. It said the jury was free to conclude from her description of her drinking habits and her hospitalization that she had been an alcoholic and that the condition substantially limited major life functions like taking care of herself. (Diaz v. Saucon Valley Manor, et al., No. 13-4340, 3rd Cir., 2014)
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- When FMLA and ADA could be factors, consider both laws before denying return to work
- Tale of two cases: How to avoid costly FMLA and ADA mistakes
- Is it permissible to recover education reimbursements from final paychecks?
- Must we offer time off as an ADA accommodation?