If your company is classified as a motor carrier, don’t expect the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA) to protect you from misclassification claims. That’s the lesson learned by one motor carrier after a recent California Supreme Court decision.
Recent case: Alfredo is the owner and manager of Pac Anchor Transportation, a trucking company in Long Beach. He recruits drivers to drive his trucks and had been classifying them as independent contractors. The drivers invest no capital, own no trucks and do not use their own tools or equipment. The drivers, who have been employed for extended periods of time, can be discharged without cause. They do not have their own customers, nor any substantial control over operations. The drivers take all their instructions from Alfredo.
California sued Alfredo’s company for allegedly misclassifying the drivers as independent contractors.
Alfredo argued that the FAAAA preempted the action. The case worked its way up to the California Supreme Court, which said the FAAAA did not control the state’s efforts to enforce wage-and-hour laws. Alfredo’s company must comply. (Harris v. Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc. No. S194388, California Supreme Court, 2014)
Final note: The case was remanded to the lower court, which will decide if the drivers were independent contractors. Based on their duties and the control the carrier exercises over how they do their jobs, it’s quite possible the drivers will end up classified as employees rather than independent contractors.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Warn supervisors: Wage mistakes could mean personal liability--and they would have to pay!
- York County official claims hard times led her to steal
- Court: Job changes must cause real harm to form basis for employee's lawsuit
- Update from Sacramento: 4 new California laws will affect HR