Alcoholism may be a disability under the ADA and a serious health condition under the, but that doesn’t mean employers have to tolerate employees who come to work drunk. In fact, being under the influence at work can be misconduct, disqualifying the employee from getting unemployment payments.
Simply put, alcoholism is not a defense to a finding of workplace misconduct.
Recent case: Johnnie Rollins, a cook, received repeated warnings not to come to work under the influence. When he went home during a shift, drank beer and returned to work, his supervisor had had enough. He fired Rollins.
Rollins applied for unemployment, but the referee found him guilty of misconduct, barring him from benefits. Rollins appealed, arguing that alcoholism was a defense and that as an alcoholic, he couldn’t help himself. Therefore he wasn’t guilty of intentional misconduct.
The appeals court refused to award benefits. It said coming to work intoxicated precludes benefits. (Rollins v. Bay HR and Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, No. 4D07-293, Court of Appeals of Florida, 2007)
Final note: Remember that someone with an alcohol problem may be entitled tofor treatment and may require an accommodation under the ADA. That doesn’t mean, however, that you have to tolerate a drunken employee in the workplace.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Worker just mentions family member's illness? That's not adequate FMLA notice
- You don't have to chase down FMLA certification
- FMLA compliance doesn't rule out enforcing attendance policy
- Military Family Leave: New employee rights under the FMLA