Employers can’t fire an employee who is about to reach the threshold foreligibility if the employee has other accrued leave available to bridge her to FMLA eligibility.
Recent case: Ena hadn’t quite reached her eligibility date forwhen she announced she was pregnant and would want to take 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA leave after giving birth. She ordinarily worked 30 hours per week.
Because she experienced an ectopic pregnancy in the past, Ena’s doctors categorized her pregnancy as high risk and immediately told her employer she couldn’t mop floors. Later, the doctor added “no snow removal” to her restrictions. Then, just before Ena would become eligible for FMLA leave, her doctor restricted her to working no more than 20 hours per week.
The employer fired Ena when she showed up for her next shift. Ena was just 10 hours short of reaching FMLA eligibility and had other leave available to cover the gap.
Ena sued, alleging that the employer interfered with her right to FMLA leave and that she would have used her FMLA time to make up the 10 hours per week that her doctor’s restriction prevented her from working.
The employer argued it was free to fire Ena up until she was actually FMLA eligible.
The court disagreed. It explained that FMLA is an entitlement and that employers must allow employees to reach FMLA eligibility if they have enough other leave available to get there. (Wages v. Stuart, No. 12-2905, DC MN, 2014)
Final note: The court said it would be a different matter if the eligibility date had been much later and Ena could not have reached it using available leave. However, she might then have been eligible for a reasonable accommodation under the ADA.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Family ties: Discrimination trend ... and trap!
- What should we do? Employee has used all her sick leave, but she's still sick
- How much notice are employees required to give when they need FMLA leave?
- Telecommuters eligible for FMLA? Geography may be irrelevant.