The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear appeals of rulings that declared two of the nation’s most far-reaching anti-immigrant statutes unconstitutional. The towns of Farmer’s Branch, Texas, and Hazleton, Pa., had adopted ordinances punishing landlords who rented to “illegal immigrants.” The Hazleton ordinance also targeted employers that hired illegals.
In both cases, local landlords and business owners were joined by the American Civil Liberties Union to oppose the laws. Courts consistently sided with the ACLU against the towns. With the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the appeals, the ordinances will never go into effect.
Note: While employers must obtain the proper I-9 documentation at hiring time, the courts have consistently ruled that local ordinances imposing additional penalties on employers are unconstitutional.
- How to Fire an Employee the Legal Way: 6 Termination Guidelines
- Warn supervisors: Wage mistakes could mean personal liability--and they would have to pay!
- Who pays for required work uniforms?
- Does the ADA allow us to look into dangers posed by employee's recurring medical crises?
- Can you fire someone for his online (but off-Duty) actions?