Here’s an easy way to avoid unnecessary litigation: If you are disciplining an employee for missing too much work, don’t tie absences to a disabled relative’s condition. If you do, you may end up losing an association discrimination case.
Recent case: Sandra had a disabled son and frequently had to take time off to care for his medical needs. Her employer knew about the child. She continued to miss work even after she ran out of leave.
Her employer fired her after handing her a memo that outlined the absences. It stated that she was being terminated because of “absences due to her minor son’s medical condition.”
That statement, the court concluded, was enough to tie her termination to her relationship with her disabled son, creating a disability-association discrimination claim. (Ruiz v. Edcouch-Elsa Independent School District, No. 7:13-CV-443, SD TX, 2014)
- Court: If employees hold the job, they're 'Qualified'
- Employee wants transfer to avoid harassment? Be sure to note that she requested it
- Think contractors can't sue for bias? They can--under little-noticed Section 1981
- Lawsuit: NYC watch seller had no time for crucifix
- You can ban outsiders from ADA accommodation talks